Social media ban “not a silver bullet” says Children’s Rights Alliance

Children’s Rights Alliance has criticised Tánaiste Simon Harris for saying that Ireland should introduce a social media ban for under-16’s.

Noeline Blackwell, Online Safety Coordinator with the Children’s Rights Alliance, said “yet again prominent politicians decree that a ban on social media for children and young people under 16 is the solution to keeping children safe online.”

“UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is the latest political leader to announce this. He, like others, recognises the risks that children may encounter on tech platforms through indefinite scrolling, addictive algorithms, contact with strangers and the like. It is reported that Tánaiste Simon Harris TD has said that Ireland should follow suit, but would prefer a Europe wide approach.”

She noted “in fact, Europe is considering the question in some depth, with evidence still being collected, and a report due in July. Ireland has been weighing up the same considerations. After several months of investigation and testimony on what is needed to be done on the regulation of online platforms and the improvement of safety online, the Oireachtas Committee on Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport reported in May that not a single expert witness recommended a ban.”

“Based on evidence, the Committee recommended that the platforms who produce the addictive and risky products be stopped from doing that through adjusting their recommender systems, disabling features that allow excessive use and better moderation. In other words, get the architects of these risky products to fix the designs so that they are safer.”

On Sunday (14 June) over 140 children’s rights organisations across Europe, including the Children’s Rights Alliance and our members CyberSafeKids and the ISPCC, as well as independent experts like Professor Brian O’Neill (TUD), signed an evidence-based letter to the EU Commission to again emphasise that it is wrong and unfair to require children to pay the price by restriction for the fixable faults of the tech companies.

Blackwell explained “the point is that the laws and regulations are there – they just aren’t implemented in a strong enough way. While attention is pulled towards silver bullet bans, we are failing to maintain protections that we do have in place to help prevent harm online, or sanction platforms sufficiently for harms happening on their watch. Just two months ago, the European Parliament refused to continue a measure that required tech companies to monitor their platforms to stop child sexual abuse material getting through.”

She said, “we need political leadership to stand up for children, young people and wider society against a tech lobby that is enormous, endlessly wealthy and litigious, and extremely powerful.”

“Yes, they have been allowed to expand and develop across the world with minimal regulation for the past three decades. Yes, it may be a bit awkward for them to have to slow down their profits to build proper gateways to stop children accessing unsafe content and systems,” she remarked.

“They may not like that they now have to comply with regulation, and government and the EU Commission may not want to offend them,” she theorised.

“Banning children does not place any responsibility on the platforms to re-design their sites and services to ensure harmful and illegal content is not readily available or easily circulated. It does not make them turn off recommender systems that trap us all in endless loops that can be seriously dangerous for young people’s mental health or physical safety. Nor is there sufficient evidence that it is going to work.

“We need to hold to account the vast industry that has become used to the untrammelled pursuit of profit and lack of responsibility. Politicians need to take themselves away from the easy answer and closer to observing their responsibilities to children and young people and ensuring their rights – all their rights – are upheld,” Blackwell said.